Shaikh al-Albaani

Translations From His Works

Tag: intellect

Use Your Brain


 

 

Questioner: A questioner says, ‘When some scholars give a religious verdict [fatwaa] in a certain issue and another group of scholars give a verdict which is the opposite of the first, which one should the common Muslim follow?’

Al-Albaani: The common Muslims must have a general education … the common masses must have a general, Islamic education; by ‘general education’ I mean the one which it is obligatory on every Muslim to know even if he is from the common masses, that he know the truth is not pluralistic.

So when, as occurs in the question, there are two contradictory statements, this common Muslim must call to mind that one of them is correct and the other is a mistake, due to His Saying, the Mighty and Majestic, “So after the truth, what else can there be, save error?” [Yunus 10:32]

So when he brings this principle to mind it will motivate him to ask the people of knowledge, ‘You say it’s permissible … and you say it’s not … what’s your proof? And what’s your proof?’ This will open up a path to understanding and awareness and then he can choose what he feels at ease with and what his heart opens up to, and he will be rewarded.

As for him going against this legislated principle and saying as many of the people today do that, ‘Whoever blindly follows a scholar will meet Allaah safe and sound,’ [then] where has this sentence come from? It is not in the Book of Allaah and nor in a hadith from Allaah’s Messenger صلى الله عليه وسلم, it’s only a sentence [prevalent] on the tongues of the common folk, ‘Whoever blindly follows a scholar will meet Allaah safe and sound …’ no.

Rather whoever follows Allaah’s Guidance is the one who is rightly guided, and whoever goes astray then it goes against himself, I just said to you now that Allaah said, “So ask the people of the message if you do not know,” [Nahl 16:43] He said, “… the people of the message [dhikr] …” hereby the word ‘message’ [dhikr] what is not intended is the dhikr which some of the ignorant Sufis are familiar with, dancing while doing dhikr and going crazy in it, and they call it, as he عليه السلام said regarding something else [but which still applies here], “… they will name it with other than its [real] name …” they call dancing and ecstasy [tawaajud] the remembrance of Allaah the Mighty and Majestic, but on the contrary it is play and amusement, in addition to another sin, which is to call things by names other than their legislated ones.

So the dhikr mentioned in the verse is the Quraan, as He the Mighty and Majestic said, “And We revealed to you the message [i.e., the Quraan] that you may make clear to the people what was sent down to them …” [Nahl 16:44] so the dhikr here is the Quraan, “So ask the people of the message if you do not know.”

And there is another caveat for this questioner [to bear in mind] here: this person says [the thing being discussed is] permissible and that one says it’s not permissible, Yaa akhi, are these people really scholars? Are they scholars of the Book of Allaah and the hadith of His Messenger صلى الله عليه وسلم? Or do they differ most greatly? This one giving a fatwa according to the Book of Allaah and the hadith of His Messenger صلى الله عليه وسلم and that [other] one maybe walking on all fours, i.e., not walking according to the Book or the Sunnah but only according to the four madhhabs, taking whatever he fancies from them.

What a difference there is between these two.

For this reason, it is fitting that the common Muslim—and [when] I say, ‘The common Muslim,’ [it] doesn’t mean that he doesn’t understand … no, if he couldn’t understand it would mean he is mad, and if he was mad then he would not be accountable—but [on the contrary] he can understand, it’s only that he is not a scholar—thus, he must use his intellect, so when two statements come to him, one of them will have come from someone who is not a scholar, and so such a statement has no weight, and thus the first opinion stands.

And it may happen and we do not deny it: that both of them may be scholars of the Book and the Sunnah but the issue may be a disputed or controversial one, and this happens as it did in the past, and it can happen today, here the common Muslim must use his brain and strip away his desires and not follow them which would be something that would lead him away from Allaah’s Path, and he عليه السلام, “The mujaahid is the one who strives against his desires for the Sake of Allaah.”

But most regretfully, when the elite, the elite of the people today seek out the fatwa which suits them … he will say to you—Yaa akhi, and all of them say that they go back to the sayings of Allaah’s Messenger—[but then] he takes whatever suits him from these madhhabs, [if this is the case with the elite] what are we to say about the common folk then? And as was said:

If the man of the house is beating the daff, those living in it will dance along.

So if this is the case with the elite, except for those whom Allaah has had mercy on, and how few they are, then what will the state of the general folk be?

I remind the elite and the general masses that the religion is not desires but rather knowledge, and it is upon the general folk to learn how to ask questions.

And maybe in some of these blessed, inshaa Allaah, gatherings I have on more than one occasion mentioned that hadith narrated by Abu Dawud in his Sunan that the Prophet صلى الله عليه وسلم sent a detachment to fight in the Way of Allaah, whereupon one of them received wounds to his body, when he awoke in the morning, he found that he needed to take a ghusl, and so he asked those around him whether they knew of an excuse for him not to have to bathe, they said no, that he must take a ghusl, so he did and died because when the water got on his wounds they festered … and so on and his temperature rose and he died.

When news about what happened to him reached the Prophet صلى الله عليه وسلم he became extremely angry عليه الصلاة والسلام and said, “They killed him, may Allaah kill them,” i.e., the ones who gave the fatwa that he had to take a ghusl were the reason for his death, “They killed him, may Allaah kill them, should they not have asked if they didn’t know?!  Verily the cure for ignorance is to question! It would have been enough for him had he performed tayammum.”

So, those [Companions] gave him a fatwa without knowledge, so we take a lesson from this hadith, that it is not fitting for the common folk to ask [just] anyone who claims knowledge, or who it is claimed has knowledge, but rather, O Muslim, the person who you know does not give fatwas except based upon, ‘Allaah said … Allaah’s Messenger said,’ such a person is the one you should direct your question to, as for those people who say what they do not do, and who give fatwas that aren’t based upon the Book and the Sunnah, then such people are not scholars.

And these are the people the Prophet صلى الله عليه وسلم foretold [us] about when he said, as occurs in Sahih Bukhari and Muslim from the hadith of Abdullaah ibn Amr ibn al-Aas, may Allaah the Most High be pleased with them both, that, ‘Allaah’s Messenger صلى الله عليه وسلم said, “Verily, Allaah does not take away knowledge by snatching it from the breasts of the scholars, but He takes it away by taking away the scholars such that when no scholar remains the people take the ignorant ones as leaders and so they are asked and give religious verdicts without knowledge and [thus] are misguided and lead others astray [too].”

This is the state of affairs of many of those in places of responsibility today who it is thought are from the people of knowledge [but who really aren’t], and so the commoner who asks [them] a question becomes confused: ‘This one says haraam and that one says halaal, or this one says obligatory and that one says sunnah,’ or other such things from the issues which are disputed.

A process of purification must be carried out in the minds of all the common folk: the scholar of the Book and the Sunnah must be filtered from the one who, as some of the witty people in our country Syria say, ‘The scholars are of two types. One is a scholar-doer, the other is the doer-scholar!’ The ‘scholar-doer’ i.e., is a scholar who acts upon his knowledge, and the ‘doer-scholar’ is the one who does things and whose status is that of a scholar but who has nothing whatsoever to do with knowledge.

And unfortunately this is present, and whoever doesn’t know, let him go and try [and he’ll see how true what I am saying is].

Ask whoever you want from those who you think are from the people of knowledge well-known amongst the people, and I will not name them even if only by title, ask whoever you want, even though it [i.e., a certain situation] may be a fiqh issue in which there is difference of opinion, he will answer you according to the madhhab he grew up on, was nurtured on, and became old on, he will give you a fatwa according to it, and then you will say, ‘What’s the proof?’ And he will say [rhetorically], ‘We are people of proof? How can we understand the proof?’ This is if he is forthright [admitting that he doesn’t know the proof], but if he is someone who hides things, he will say, ‘How are you going to perceive the proof?’ So he covers his own ignorance by declaring others to be ignorant.

This, unfortunately, is the reality of many people today, and the One whose Aid is sought is Allaah.

Al-Hudaa wan-Noor, 455.

On Hizbut-Tahrir | 3


Translated by Ahmed Abu Turaab

“This is a reality which, very regrettably, all of the Islamic sects are ignorant of, especially Hizb at-Tahrir, which is unique among Islamic groups in giving the human intellect a station greater than that given to it by Islaam.

We know with certainty that when Allaah, the Mighty and Majestic, addresses the people with His Speech He is only addressing the intellectuals, He is addressing the scholars, He is addressing those who think and reflect, but we [also] know that the human intellect differs. The intellect is of two types: the Muslim intellect and that of the disbeliever.

This intellect of the disbeliever is not intellect, it may be smartness/cleverness but it is not intellect. Because the [term] intellect in the Arabic language [refers to] that which shackles somebody, binds him and restricts him from going to the right or left. And it is not possible for the intellect not to [incorrectly] turn to the right or left except by following the Book of Allaah and the Sunnah of the Messenger of Allaah صلى الله عليه وسلم.

For this reason Allaah, the Mighty and the Majestic, related that when the disbelievers and the polytheists acknowledge the reality of their situation … that when they are described as Allaah, the Mighty and Majestic, said in the Noble Quraan, “They know what is apparent of the worldly life, but they, of the Hereafter, are unaware …” [Room 30:7] … they will acknowledge that although they were acquainted with worldly matters they were not intellectuals, [which is seen in] their saying which our Lord relates concerning them, “And they will say, ‘Had we but listened or used our intelligence, we would not have been among the companions of the Blaze.” [Al-Mulk 67:10]. Thus, there are two intellects: the true/real intellect and the figurative/metaphorical one.

The true intellect is that of the Muslim who believes in Allaah and His Messenger. As for the figurative one, then it is that of the disbeliever. For this reason, He, the Most High, said in the Quraan as you just heard, “And they will say, ‘Had we but listened or used our intelligence, we would not have been among the companions of the Blaze.” And He said about the disbelievers generally, “They have hearts wherewith they understand not.” [Al-A’raaf 7:179].

Thus, they do have hearts, but they do not understand [the Truth] through them, they do not comprehend the Truth with them.

When we have understood this reality, and it is a reality which I do not think any two will differ over, or any two rams will clash horns over, because it is explicitly in the Quraan and in the sayings of the Messenger صلى الله عليه وسلم but I want to move from this reality to another which is the [actual] point I am trying to make at this time.

So when the intellect of the disbeliever is not [in fact] intellect, then [in the same way] the intellect of the Muslim is also of two types: that of the scholar and that of the ignorant person.

The intellect of the ignorant Muslim cannot be equal to the intellect and understanding of the scholar, they can never be equal when compared. That is why Allaah, the Most High, said, “… but none will understand them except those who have knowledge …” [Ankaboot 29:43].

Thus, it is not permissible for the true Muslim, the one who truly believes in Allah and His Messenger to invest his intellect with the authority to judge, but he should rather make his intellect submit to what Allaah and His Messenger صلى الله عليه وسلم said.

It is from here that I make a point regarding Hizb at-Tahrir: that they were affected by the Mu’tazilah in their starting point in the path of faith, and the path of faith is a title they have given in some of the books written by their head, Tadiyud-Deen an-Nabahaani, may Allaah have mercy on him. I met him a number of times and am fully acquainted with him. And I am very well-versed and acquainted with what Hizb at-Tahrir are upon. For this, I speak with knowledge, inshaa Allaah, about that which their call stands upon. So this is the first point made against them: that they gave the intellect an excellence greater than it deserves.

I repeat to you what I just said earlier: I do not deny that the intellect has its importance as has preceded, but it is not for the intellect to judge the Book and the Sunnah, rather all that is upon it is to understand what has been reported in the Book and the Sunnah.

It is from here that the Mu’tazilah went astray in the past, they denied many, very many, legislated realities, due to the fact that they empowered their intellects over the texts of the Book and the Sunnah which, as a result, they distorted, altered and changed, and in the expression of the scholars of the Pious Predecessors, “They dispensed with the texts of the Book and the Sunnah.”

I want to draw your attention to this point, which is: that it is befitting that the Muslim intellect submit to the text of the Book and the Sunnah after having understood the Book and the Sunnah.

So the judge is [the saying of] Allaah and the Messenger of Allaah. It is not the human intellect due to [the reason] we have stated that the intellect of humans differs, the intellect of the Muslim and non-Muslim differs [from each other]; the intellect of the Muslim differs, that of the ignorant Muslim differs from that of the Muslim who understands, for the understanding of the Muslim scholar is not like that of the ignorant Muslim.

That is why He, the Most High, said, and there is no harm in repeating [what we said earlier], because I know that this topic is something which millions and millions of Muslims men, let alone the women, do not hear. For this reason I am obliged to repeat these points and these proofs, “… but none will understand them except those who have knowledge …””

%d bloggers like this: